The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Overestimated water storage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Geoscience, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/ngeo1659 |
Authors |
Leonard F. Konikow |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 40% |
Researcher | 6 | 30% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 55% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 25% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,896,985
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#2,899
of 3,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,112
of 293,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#53
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.