↓ Skip to main content

Revisited aspects of the local set in CHSH Bell scenario

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Quantum Information, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Revisited aspects of the local set in CHSH Bell scenario
Published in
International Journal of Quantum Information, February 2023
DOI 10.1142/s0219749923400051
Authors

Nicolás Gigena, Giovanni Scala, Antonio Mandarino

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,840,926
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Quantum Information
#99
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,232
of 387,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Quantum Information
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them