The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Central Venous Disease Increases the Risk of Microbial Colonization in Hemodialysis Catheters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.645539 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xianhui Liang, Yamin Liu, Bohan Chen, Ping Li, Peixiang Zhao, Zhangsuo Liu, Pei Wang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,301,881
of 23,351,247 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,067
of 5,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,108
of 430,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#85
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,351,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.