The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of Roads, Rivers, and Mountains on Natal Dispersal of White-Tailed Deer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.2193/2009-096 |
Authors |
Eric S. Long, Duane R. Diefenbach, Bret D. Wallingford, Christopher S. Rosenberry |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 17% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,422,545
of 23,832,995 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#517
of 2,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,842
of 96,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,832,995 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.