The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An improved procedure for detection and enumeration of walrus signatures in airborne thermal imagery
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jag.2009.05.004 |
Authors |
Douglas M. Burn, Mark S. Udevitz, Suzann G. Speckman, R. Bradley Benter |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 41% |
Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 46% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 30% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2009.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation
#242
of 1,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,937
of 106,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them