The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of a local-scale urban stream assessment method using benthic macroinvertebrates: an example from the Santa Clara Basin, California
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the North American Benthological Society, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1899/08-159.1 |
Authors |
James L. Carter, Alison H. Purcell, Steve V. Fend, Vincent H. Resh |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 39 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 17 | 38% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,601,770
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the North American Benthological Society
#326
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,692
of 108,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the North American Benthological Society
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.