The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of Ionic Strength, Temperature, and pH on Degradation of Selected Antibiotics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Environmental Quality, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.2134/jeq2007.0230 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Keith A. Loftin, Craig D. Adams, Michael T. Meyer, Rao Surampalli |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Poland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 22% |
Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 49 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 38 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 12% |
Chemistry | 14 | 7% |
Engineering | 13 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
Other | 36 | 19% |
Unknown | 61 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,896,985
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Environmental Quality
#997
of 3,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,744
of 97,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Environmental Quality
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.