The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Antarctic ice streams and outflow channels on Mars
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2001
|
DOI | 10.1029/2000gl011924 |
Authors |
Baerbel K. Lucchitta |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Norway | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 37% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 15 | 79% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 11% |
Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,375,176
of 24,858,211 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,054
of 20,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,032
of 115,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#13
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,858,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.