The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical Aspects of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis With Severe Ocular Complications in India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.643955 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Swapna S. Shanbhag, Virender S. Sangwan, Aastha Singh, Pragnya R. Donthineni, Sayan Basu, Bhaskar Srinivasan, Shweta Agarwal, Geetha Iyer |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 3% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 17 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
Unspecified | 7 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,464
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,858
of 6,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,300
of 430,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#139
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.