The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Maternal and Neonatal Complications After Natural vs. Hormone Replacement Therapy Cycle Regimen for Frozen Single Blastocyst Transfer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2020.00338 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jia Lin, Junzhao Zhao, Guimin Hao, Jichun Tan, Ye Pan, Ze Wang, Qi Jiang, Ning Xu, Yuhua Shi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#15,783,392
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,208
of 6,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,695
of 400,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#131
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.