↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Rates of Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Midcontinental North America

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
4 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing Rates of Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in Midcontinental North America
Published in
Science, August 1992
DOI 10.1126/science.257.5071.784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward B. Swain, Daniel R. Engstrom, Mark E. Brigham, Thomas A. Henning, Patrick L. Brezonik

Abstract

Mercury contamination of remote lakes has been attributed to increasing deposition of atmospheric mercury, yet historic deposition rates and inputs from terrestrial sources are essentially unknown. Sediments of seven headwater lakes in Minnesota and Wisconsin were used to reconstruct regional modern and preindustrial deposition rates of mercury. Whole-basin mercury fluxes, determined from lake-wide arrays of dated cores, indicate that the annual deposition of atmospheric mercury has increased from 3.7 to 12.5 micrograms per square meter since 1850 and that 25 percent of atmospheric mercury deposition to the terrestrial catchment is exported to the lake. The deposition increase is similar among sites, implying regional or global sources for the mercury entering these lakes.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
Canada 5 5%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 86 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 9 9%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 11%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,248,569
of 26,601,477 outputs
Outputs from Science
#21,413
of 84,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203
of 18,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#5
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,601,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.