The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quantitative assessment of mineral resources with an application to petroleum geology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Natural Resources Research, March 1992
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01782114 |
Authors |
J. Harff, J. C. Davis, R. A. Olea |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Unknown | 6 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 38% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 63% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Natural Resources Research
#26
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,226
of 17,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Resources Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them