The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Acute Toxicity to Daphnia Pulex of Six Classes of Chemical Compounds Potentially Hazardous to Great Lakes Aquatic Biota
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, January 1988
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0380-1330(88)71572-5 |
Authors |
Stephen B. Smith, Jacqueline F. Savino, Marc A. Blouin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 1% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 1% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | <1% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 91% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Chemistry | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 202 | 92% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,750,900
of 26,445,486 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#337
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,526
of 49,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,445,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.