The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth System Science Data, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.5194/essd-15-963-2023 |
| Authors |
Brendan Byrne, David F. Baker, Sourish Basu, Michael Bertolacci, Kevin W. Bowman, Dustin Carroll, Abhishek Chatterjee, Frédéric Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Noel Cressie, David Crisp, Sean Crowell, Feng Deng, Zhu Deng, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sha Feng, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Benedikt Herkommer, Lei Hu, Andrew R. Jacobson, Rajesh Janardanan, Sujong Jeong, Matthew S. Johnson, Dylan B. A. Jones, Rigel Kivi, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Shamil Maksyutov, John B. Miller, Scot M. Miller, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Tomohiro Oda, Christopher W. O'Dell, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, Prabir K. Patra, Hélène Peiro, Christof Petri, Sajeev Philip, David F. Pollard, Benjamin Poulter, Marine Remaud, Andrew Schuh, Mahesh K. Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Colm Sweeney, Yao Té, Hanqin Tian, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Thorsten Warneke, John R. Worden, Debra Wunch, Yuanzhi Yao, Jeongmin Yun, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, Ning Zeng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 18 | 19% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Paraguay | 3 | 3% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 58 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 87% |
| Scientists | 10 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 514. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#53,012
of 26,576,308 outputs
Outputs from Earth System Science Data
#17
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,463
of 434,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth System Science Data
#3
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,576,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.