The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Parallelisation of decision-making techniques in aquaculture enterprises
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Journal of Supercomputing, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11227-023-05124-3 |
Authors |
Mario Ibáñez, Manuel Luna, Jose Luis Bosque, Ramón Beivide |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Researcher | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 13% |
Unspecified | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 10% |
Decision Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,838,548
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Supercomputing
#93
of 543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,943
of 405,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Supercomputing
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.