Therapeutic drug monitoring guided dosing versus standard dosing of alectinib in advanced ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer patients: Study protocol for an international, multicenter phase IV randomized controlled trial (ADAPT ALEC)
Marinda Meertens, M. Benthe Muntinghe-Wagenaar, Barend J. Sikkema, Marta Lopez-Yurda, Valesca P. Retèl, Marthe S. Paats, Rob Ter Heine, Ed Schuuring, Wim Timens, Daan J. Touw, Job F. M. van Boven, Adrianus. J. de Langen, Sayed M. S. Hashemi, Lizza E. L. Hendriks, Sander Croes, Michel M. van den Heuvel, Anne-Marie C. Dingemans, Ron H. J. Mathijssen, Egbert F. Smit, Alwin D. R. Huitema, Neeltje Steeghs, Anthonie J. van der Wekken
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
4%
Sports and Recreations
1
4%
Immunology and Microbiology
1
4%
Medicine and Dentistry
1
4%
Other
0
0%
Unknown
15
60%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,581,620
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#285
of 23,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,703
of 433,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#8
of 1,388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
