Samuel V. Rasmussen, Agnieszka Wozniak, Melvin Lathara, Joshua M. Goldenberg, Benjamin M. Samudio, Lissett R. Bickford, Kiyo Nagamori, Hollis Wright, Andrew D. Woods, Shefali Chauhan, Che-Jui Lee, Erin R. Rudzinski, Michael K. Swift, Tadashi Kondo, David E. Fisher, Evgeny Imyanitov, Isidro Machado, Antonio Llombart-Bosch, Irene L. Andrulis, Nalan Gokgoz, Jay Wunder, Hiroshi Mirotaki, Takuro Nakamura, Ganapati Srinivasa, Khin Thway, Robin L. Jones, Paul H. Huang, Noah E. Berlow, Patrick Schöffski, Charles Keller
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
1
13%
Medicine and Dentistry
1
13%
Unknown
3
38%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#142,465
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#46
of 11,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,725
of 423,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#3
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
