The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Seed mucilage-based advanced carrier systems for food and nutraceuticals: fabrication, formulation efficiency, recent advancement, challenges, and perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1080/10408398.2023.2188564 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammad Rezaul Islam Shishir, Hao Suo, Farah Saleena Taip, Maruf Ahmed, Jianbo Xiao, Mingfu Wang, Feng Chen, Ka-Wing Cheng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Engineering | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#18,390,325
of 23,622,736 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#1,872
of 2,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,062
of 395,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
#28
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,622,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.