↓ Skip to main content

Utility of transcranial color‐coded duplex sonography in diagnosis and monitoring of PICA aneurysm in subarachnoid hemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of transcranial color‐coded duplex sonography in diagnosis and monitoring of PICA aneurysm in subarachnoid hemorrhage
Published in
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, March 2023
DOI 10.1002/jcu.23458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Issac Cheong, María Virginia Mazzola, Diego Alejandro Besada, Francisco Marcelo Tamagnone

Abstract

This case describes the successful use of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) to diagnose a posterior circulation aneurysm in a patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage. A 33-year-old, was admitted to the ICU after a brain CT scan showed peritroncal subarachnoid hemorrhage. TCCD revealed a rounded image with color Doppler near the P1 portion of the right posterior cerebral artery, which was later confirmed to be a 4 mm aneurysm at the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The aneurysm was treated with coil exclusion and TCCD confirmed its disappearance post-treatment. While TCCD has limitations, including its inability to detect small aneurysms, it is a noninvasive diagnostic tool that provides real-time visualization of the brain and allows for follow-up evaluations. This case demonstrates the potential usefulness of TCCD in diagnosing cerebral aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and for follow-up evaluations post-treatment.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,820,406
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
#122
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,818
of 412,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.