↓ Skip to main content

Restoring Visual Acuity in Dynamic Conditions with a Vestibular Implant

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restoring Visual Acuity in Dynamic Conditions with a Vestibular Implant
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2016.00577
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nils Guinand, Raymond Van de Berg, Samuel Cavuscens, Robert Stokroos, Maurizio Ranieri, Marco Pelizzone, Herman Kingma, Jean-Philippe Guyot, Angélica Pérez Fornos

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Engineering 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,417,431
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,775
of 11,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,881
of 425,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#44
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.