↓ Skip to main content

Histone Methyltransferases

Overview of attention for book
Histone Methyltransferases
Springer US

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Not all Is SET for Methylation: Evolution of Eukaryotic Protein Methyltransferases
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Detection and Quantification of Histone Methyltransferase Activity In Vitro
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 In Vitro Histone Demethylase Assays
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Preparation and Characterization of Chromatin Templates for Histone Methylation Assays
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Techniques to Study Automethylation of Histone Methyltransferases and its Functional Impact
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Profiling the Regulation of Histone Methylation and Demethylation by Metabolites and Metals
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Determination of Histone Methyltransferase Structure by Crystallography
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Determination of Histone Methyltransferase Structures in Complex with the Nucleosome by Cryogenic Electron Microscopy
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Development and Validation of Antibodies Targeting Site-Specific Histone Methylation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Genetic, Genomic, and Imaging Approaches to Dissect the Role of Polycomb Group Epigenetic Regulators in Mice
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Profiling Histone Methylation in Low Numbers of Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Automated CUT & RUN Using the KingFisher Duo Prime
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Bioinformatics Methods for ChIP-seq Histone Analysis
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Characterization of SET-Domain Histone Lysine Methyltransferase Substrates Using a Cofactor S-Adenosyl-l-Methionine Surrogate
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Specificity Analysis of Protein Methyltransferases and Discovery of Novel Substrates Using SPOT Peptide Arrays
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Identifying Specific Protein Interactors of Nucleosomes Carrying Methylated Histones Using Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Investigating Mitotic Inheritance of Histone Posttranslational Modifications by Triple pSILAC Coupled to Nascent Chromatin Capture
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Investigating Mitotic Inheritance of Histone Modifications Using Tethering Strategies
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Investigating Histone Modification Dynamics by Mechanistic Computational Modeling
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Screening for Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Histone Methyltransferases
Attention for Chapter 16: Identifying Specific Protein Interactors of Nucleosomes Carrying Methylated Histones Using Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Identifying Specific Protein Interactors of Nucleosomes Carrying Methylated Histones Using Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Chapter number 16
Book title
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, June 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2481-4_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162480-7, 978-1-07-162481-4
Authors

Tvardovskiy, Andrey, Nguyen, Nhuong, Bartke, Till, Andrey Tvardovskiy, Nhuong Nguyen, Till Bartke

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,174,126
of 26,486,749 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#590
of 14,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,441
of 450,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#4
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,486,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.