↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness of Humidified High-Flow Therapy (HHFT) for COPD Patients on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-Effectiveness of Humidified High-Flow Therapy (HHFT) for COPD Patients on Long-Term Oxygen Therapy
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, April 2023
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s400739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik J Groessl, Steven R Tally, Naomi Hillery

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 11 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#17,576,548
of 26,560,982 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#319
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,824
of 432,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,560,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.