↓ Skip to main content

Association of macronutrients intake distribution with osteoarthritis risk among adults in NHANES, 2013–2016

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of macronutrients intake distribution with osteoarthritis risk among adults in NHANES, 2013–2016
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.976619
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Peng, Shihua Gao, Fangjun Xiao, Mincong He, Weiuhua Fang, Yunqi Zhang, Qiushi Wei

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,310,255
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,527
of 6,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,291
of 406,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#235
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.