↓ Skip to main content

A rockburst grade evaluation method based on principal component analysis and the catastrophe progression method

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rockburst grade evaluation method based on principal component analysis and the catastrophe progression method
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1163187
Authors

Ying-hao Lou, Ke-gang Li

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#16,977,451
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#1,835
of 6,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,171
of 424,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#50
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.