The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Alpha-synuclein oligomers alter the spontaneous firing discharge of cultured midbrain neurons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2023.1176036 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giulia Tomagra, Claudio Franchino, Federico Cesano, Giovanni Chiarion, Antonio de Iure, Emilio Carbone, Paolo Calabresi, Luca Mesin, Barbara Picconi, Andrea Marcantoni, Valentina Carabelli |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,356,079
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#897
of 4,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,057
of 331,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#12
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.