↓ Skip to main content

Developing the ethics of implementation research in health

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing the ethics of implementation research in health
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13012-016-0527-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijayaprasad Gopichandran, Valerie A. Luyckx, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Amy Fairchild, Jerome Singh, Nhan Tran, Abha Saxena, Pascal Launois, Andreas Reis, Dermot Maher, Mahnaz Vahedi

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Other 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 20%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 12%
Psychology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 62 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,768,405
of 26,451,184 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#301
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,179
of 425,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.