You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Eat, Sleep, Console Approach or Usual Care for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2214470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslie W. Young, Songthip T. Ounpraseuth, Stephanie L. Merhar, Zhuopei Hu, Alan E. Simon, Andrew A. Bremer, Jeannette Y. Lee, Abhik Das, Margaret M. Crawford, Rachel G. Greenberg, P. Brian Smith, Brenda B. Poindexter, Rosemary D. Higgins, Michele C. Walsh, Ward Rice, David A. Paul, Jessie R. Maxwell, Sucheta Telang, Camille M. Fung, Tanner Wright, Anne Marie Reynolds, Devon W. Hahn, Julie Ross, Jennifer M. McAllister, Moira Crowley, Sophie K. Shaikh, Karen M. Puopolo, Lori Christ, Jaime Brown, Julie Riccio, Kara Wong Ramsey, Akshatha, Erica F. Braswell, Lauren Tucker, Karen R. McAlmon, Krishna Dummula, Julie Weiner, Jessica R. White, Meghan P. Howell, Sarah Newman, Jessica N. Snowden, Lori A. Devlin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 22% |
| Australia | 5 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 109 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 62% |
| Scientists | 29 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 806. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#24,301
of 26,146,017 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#988
of 32,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#701
of 415,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#32
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,146,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.