↓ Skip to main content

ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer – Update 2023*

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 3,552)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
110 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer – Update 2023*
Published in
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, May 2023
DOI 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004429
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Cibula, Maria Rosaria Raspollini, François Planchamp, Carlos Centeno, Cyrus Chargari, Ana Felix, Daniela Fischerová, Daniela Jahnn-Kuch, Florence Joly, Christhardt Kohler, Sigurd Lax, Domenica Lorusso, Umesh Mahantshetty, Patrice Mathevet, Raj Naik, Remi A Nout, Ana Oaknin, Fedro Peccatori, Jan Persson, Denis Querleu, Sandra Rubio Bernabé, Maximilian P Schmid, Artem Stepanyan, Valentyn Svintsitskyi, Karl Tamussino, Ignacio Zapardiel, Jacob Lindegaard

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 207 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Master 11 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 124 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 125 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#599,110
of 26,527,568 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#9
of 3,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,233
of 418,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,527,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.