The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Passive Tick Surveillance, Dog Seropositivity, and Incidence of Human Lyme Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases, June 2004
|
DOI | 10.1089/1530366041210710 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jaree L. Johnson, Howard S. Ginsberg, Elyes Zhioua, Ulysses G. Whitworth, Daniel Markowski, Kerwin E. Hyland, Renjie Hu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 40% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 19% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,885,886
of 26,345,808 outputs
Outputs from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#438
of 1,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,551
of 61,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vector Borne & Zoonotic Diseases
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,345,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them