The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of movement related cortical potential in healthy people and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2013.00065 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ying Gu, Dario Farina, Ander R. Murguialday, Kim Dremstrup, Niels Birbaumer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 25% |
Researcher | 16 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 29 | 35% |
Neuroscience | 14 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Psychology | 7 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,456
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,815
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#187
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.