The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003928.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meaghan E Coyle, Caroline Smith, Brian Peat |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 49 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,354,625
of 26,451,336 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,673
of 13,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,608
of 412,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,336 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.