The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discerning the Subfibrillar Structure of Mineralized Collagen Fibrils: A Model for the Ultrastructure of Bone
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0076782 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuping Li, Conrado Aparicio |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Materials Science | 10 | 14% |
Chemistry | 8 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,835,254
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#96,517
of 202,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,268
of 204,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,031
of 4,852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.