The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A survey of local/cooperative-based malicious information detection techniques in VANETs
|
---|---|
Published in |
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13638-018-1064-y |
Authors |
Muhammad Arshad, Zahid Ullah, Naveed Ahmad, Muhammad Khalid, Haithiam Criuckshank, Yue Cao |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 20 | 47% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,449,088
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#38
of 549 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,030
of 351,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 549 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.