The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Deep learning assessment compared to radiologist reporting for metastatic spinal cord compression on CT
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151073 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan, Lei Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Shuliang Ge, Faimee Erwan Muhamat Nor, Han Yang Ong, Sterling Ellis Eide, Amanda J. L. Cheng, Tricia Kuah, Desmond Shi Wei Lim, Xi Zhen Low, Kuan Yuen Yeong, Mona I. AlMuhaish, Ahmed Mohamed Alsooreti, Nesaretnam Barr Kumarakulasinghe, Ee Chin Teo, Qai Ven Yap, Yiong Huak Chan, Shuxun Lin, Jiong Hao Tan, Naresh Kumar, Balamurugan A. Vellayappan, Beng Chin Ooi, Swee Tian Quek, Andrew Makmur |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,328,996
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,709
of 22,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,033
of 415,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#495
of 1,162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.