The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neuroplastin 65 deficiency reduces amyloid plaque formation and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2023.1129773 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dan-Dan Wu, Jie Cheng, Ya-Ni Zheng, Yu-Tong Liu, Shuang-Xin Hou, Li-Fen Liu, Liang Huang, Qiong-Lan Yuan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,495,459
of 24,026,368 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#924
of 4,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,603
of 376,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#19
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,026,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.