↓ Skip to main content

Comparing Very Low-Carbohydrate vs DASH Diets for Overweight or Obese Adults With Hypertension and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,023)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
84 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
770 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing Very Low-Carbohydrate vs DASH Diets for Overweight or Obese Adults With Hypertension and Prediabetes or Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, May 2023
DOI 10.1370/afm.2968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura R Saslow, Lenette M Jones, Ananda Sen, Julia A Wolfson, Heidi L Diez, Alison O'Brien, Cindy W Leung, Hovig Bayandorian, Jennifer Daubenmier, Amanda L Missel, Caroline Richardson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 770 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Professor 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 53 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Unspecified 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 56 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2024.
All research outputs
#13,270
of 26,798,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#3
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395
of 401,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,798,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.