The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association of airway obstruction with first-pass success and intubation-related adverse events in the emergency department: multicenter prospective observational studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2023.1199750 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jin Takahashi, Tadahiro Goto, Shigeki Fujitani, Hiroshi Okamoto, Yusuke Hagiwara, Hiroko Watase, Kohei Hasegawa, the Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,924,449
of 25,990,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#3,035
of 7,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,064
of 396,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#110
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,990,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.