↓ Skip to main content

Polygenic prediction of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
147 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polygenic prediction of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension
Published in
Nature Medicine, May 2023
DOI 10.1038/s41591-023-02374-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. Honigberg, Buu Truong, Raiyan R. Khan, Brenda Xiao, Laxmi Bhatta, Ha My T. Vy, Rafael F. Guerrero, Art Schuermans, Margaret Sunitha Selvaraj, Aniruddh P. Patel, Satoshi Koyama, So Mi Jemma Cho, Shamsudheen Karuthedath Vellarikkal, Mark Trinder, Sarah M. Urbut, Kathryn J. Gray, Ben M. Brumpton, Snehal Patil, Sebastian Zöllner, Mariah C. Antopia, Richa Saxena, Girish N. Nadkarni, Ron Do, Qi Yan, Itsik Pe’er, Shefali Setia Verma, Rajat M. Gupta, David M. Haas, Hilary C. Martin, David A. van Heel, Triin Laisk, Pradeep Natarajan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Lecturer 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 36 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Unspecified 12 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2024.
All research outputs
#287,630
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,134
of 9,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,428
of 401,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#34
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.