The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Polygenic prediction of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-023-02374-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael C. Honigberg, Buu Truong, Raiyan R. Khan, Brenda Xiao, Laxmi Bhatta, Ha My T. Vy, Rafael F. Guerrero, Art Schuermans, Margaret Sunitha Selvaraj, Aniruddh P. Patel, Satoshi Koyama, So Mi Jemma Cho, Shamsudheen Karuthedath Vellarikkal, Mark Trinder, Sarah M. Urbut, Kathryn J. Gray, Ben M. Brumpton, Snehal Patil, Sebastian Zöllner, Mariah C. Antopia, Richa Saxena, Girish N. Nadkarni, Ron Do, Qi Yan, Itsik Pe’er, Shefali Setia Verma, Rajat M. Gupta, David M. Haas, Hilary C. Martin, David A. van Heel, Triin Laisk, Pradeep Natarajan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 16% |
| Paraguay | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 116 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 48% |
| Scientists | 55 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 25% |
| Unknown | 36 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2024.
All research outputs
#286,587
of 26,625,282 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,131
of 9,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,397
of 401,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#34
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,625,282 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 108.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.