Genome-wide association meta-analysis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection identifies risk variants and genes related to artery integrity and tissue-mediated coagulation
David Adlam, Takiy-Eddine Berrandou, Adrien Georges, Christopher P. Nelson, Eleni Giannoulatou, Joséphine Henry, Lijiang Ma, Montgomery Blencowe, Tamiel N. Turley, Min-Lee Yang, Sandesh Chopade, Chris Finan, Peter S. Braund, Ines Sadeg-Sayoud, Siiri E. Iismaa, Matthew L. Kosel, Xiang Zhou, Stephen E. Hamby, Jenny Cheng, Lu Liu, Ingrid Tarr, David W. M. Muller, Valentina d’Escamard, Annette King, Liam R. Brunham, Ania A. Baranowska-Clarke, Stéphanie Debette, Philippe Amouyel, Jeffrey W. Olin, Snehal Patil, Stephanie E. Hesselson, Keerat Junday, Stavroula Kanoni, Krishna G. Aragam, Adam S. Butterworth, Marysia S. Tweet, Rajiv Gulati, Nicolas Combaret, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Jonathan M. Kalman, Diane Fatkin, Aroon D. Hingorani, Jacqueline Saw, Tom R. Webb, Sharonne N. Hayes, Xia Yang, Santhi K. Ganesh, Timothy M. Olson, Jason C. Kovacic, Robert M. Graham, Nilesh J. Samani, Nabila Bouatia-Naji
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 427. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#72,876
of 26,790,155 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#107
of 7,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,773
of 402,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#2
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,790,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
