The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical profiling of specific diagnostic subgroups of women with chronic pelvic pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health, May 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/frph.2023.1140857 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lysia Demetriou, Michal Krassowski, Pedro Abreu Mendes, Kurtis Garbutt, Allison F. Vitonis, Elizabeth Wilkins, Lydia Coxon, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Qasim Aziz, Judy Birch, Andrew W. Horne, Anja Hoffman, Lone Hummelshoj, Claire E. Lunde, Jane Meijlink, Danielle Perro, Nilufer Rahmioglu, Kathryn L. Terry, Esther Pogatzki-Zahn, Christine B. Sieberg, Rolf-Detlef Treede, Christian M. Becker, Francisco Cruz, Stacey A. Missmer, Krina T. Zondervan, Jens Nagel, Katy Vincent |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
Unspecified | 4 | 17% |
Psychology | 4 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#739,647
of 26,458,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#12
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,545
of 400,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,458,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.