↓ Skip to main content

Response to "Science and Ethics of 'Curing' Misinformation".

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to "Science and Ethics of 'Curing' Misinformation".
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, June 2023
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2023.458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamaji C Nwanaji-Enwerem

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,320,139
of 26,127,783 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1,266
of 2,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,953
of 397,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,127,783 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.