The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Latent Population Responses of Summer Birds to a Catastrophic, Climatological Event
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ornithological Applications, November 1987
|
DOI | 10.2307/1368536 |
Authors |
Fritz L. Knopf, James A. Sedgwick |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 32% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2010.
All research outputs
#5,601,280
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#448
of 2,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,534
of 11,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them