↓ Skip to main content

Garbage in, garbage out: how reliable training data improved a virtual screening approach against SARS-CoV-2 MPro

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Garbage in, garbage out: how reliable training data improved a virtual screening approach against SARS-CoV-2 MPro
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1193282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santiago M. Ruatta, Denis N. Prada Gori, Martín Fló Díaz, Franca Lorenzelli, Karen Perelmuter, Lucas N. Alberca, Carolina L. Bellera, Andrea Medeiros, Gloria V. López, Mariana Ingold, Williams Porcal, Estefanía Dibello, Irina Ihnatenko, Conrad Kunick, Marcelo Incerti, Martín Luzardo, Maximiliano Colobbio, Juan Carlos Ramos, Eduardo Manta, Lucía Minini, María Laura Lavaggi, Paola Hernández, Jonas Šarlauskas, César Sebastian Huerta García, Rafael Castillo, Alicia Hernández-Campos, Giovanni Ribaudo, Giuseppe Zagotto, Renzo Carlucci, Noelia S. Medrán, Guillermo R. Labadie, Maitena Martinez-Amezaga, Carina M. L. Delpiccolo, Ernesto G. Mata, Laura Scarone, Laura Posada, Gloria Serra, Theodora Calogeropoulou, Kyriakos Prousis, Anastasia Detsi, Mauricio Cabrera, Guzmán Alvarez, Adrián Aicardo, Verena Araújo, Cecilia Chavarría, Lucija Peterlin Mašič, Melisa E. Gantner, Manuel A. Llanos, Santiago Rodríguez, Luciana Gavernet, Soonju Park, Jinyeong Heo, Honggun Lee, Kyu-Ho Paul Park, Mariela Bollati-Fogolín, Otto Pritsch, David Shum, Alan Talevi, Marcelo A. Comini

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 9 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,454,721
of 26,208,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,589
of 20,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,649
of 387,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#35
of 756 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,208,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 756 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.