You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
CERVICAL NECROTIZING FASCIITIS DUE TO BACTERIAL TONSILLITIS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, April 2005
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322005000200015 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bruno Zilberstein, Roberto de Cleva, Renato Scarsi Testa, Ubirajara Sene, Rony Eshkenazy, Joaquim José Gama-Rodrigues |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 58% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#327
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,354
of 69,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them