The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pre-Olympia Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Chronology in the Central Puget Lowland, Washington
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1967
|
DOI | 10.1130/0016-7606(1967)78[13:ppsaci]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
DONALD J EASTERBROOK, DWIGHT R CRANDELL, ESTELLA B LEOPOLD |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#1,163
of 2,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,134
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.