↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal variation of marsh vegetation productivity and climatic effects in Inner Mongolia, China

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatiotemporal variation of marsh vegetation productivity and climatic effects in Inner Mongolia, China
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1138965
Authors

Yanji Wang, Jiaqi Zhang, Xiangjin Shen, Rong Ma, Yiwen Liu, Liyuan Wu, Shouzheng Tong, Ming Jiang, Xianguo Lu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,351,685
of 26,208,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,728
of 5,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,966
of 386,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#139
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,208,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.