↓ Skip to main content

A study on the multi-objective optimization method and characteristic analysis of installation locations of submersible mixer for sewage

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Energy Research, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study on the multi-objective optimization method and characteristic analysis of installation locations of submersible mixer for sewage
Published in
Frontiers in Energy Research, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1180607
Authors

Fei Tian, Chen Yang, Erfeng Zhang, Dehua Sun, Weidong Shi, Yonghua Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,381,945
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Energy Research
#973
of 4,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,131
of 376,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Energy Research
#21
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,808 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.