You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A teoria e a prática: a questão da diferença no discurso sobre e da sala de aula
|
---|---|
Published in |
DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, February 1998
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-44501998000100003 |
Authors |
Maria José R. F. Coracini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 40% |
Professor | 1 | 20% |
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 20% |
Linguistics | 1 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
Materials Science | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
#100
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,258
of 95,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.