The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interventions for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013178.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Won Sun Chen, Renukha Sellappans, Shakirah Binti Md Sharif, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Nai Ming Lai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
Austria | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 38 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 42 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,163,879
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,708
of 13,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,196
of 375,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.